- Title
- Informing the development of the SUCCEED reporting guideline for studies on the scaling of health interventions: A systematic review
- Creator
- Gogovor, Amédé; Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon; Rochon, Paula; Rheault, Nathalie; Légaré, France; Ben Charif, Ali; Ekanmian, Giraud; Moher, David; McLean, Robert K. D.; Milat, Andrew; Wolfenden, Luke; Prévost, Karina; Aubin, Emmanuelle
- Relation
- Medicine Vol. 103, Issue 7, no. e37079
- Publisher Link
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000037079
- Publisher
- Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Publications and Media
- Resource Type
- journal article
- Date
- 2024
- Description
- Background: Quality reporting contributes to effective translation of health research in practice and policy. As an initial step in the development of a reporting guideline for scaling, the Standards for reporting stUdies of sCaling evidenCEd-informED interventions (SUCCEED), we performed a systematic review to identify relevant guidelines and compile a list of potential items. Methods: We conducted a systematic review according to Cochrane method guidelines. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, from their respective inceptions. We also searched websites of relevant organizations and Google. We included any document that provided instructions or recommendations, e.g., reporting guideline, checklist, guidance, framework, standard; could inform the design or reporting of scaling interventions; and related to the health sector. We extracted characteristics of the included guidelines and assessed their methodological quality using a 3-item internal validity assessment tool. We extracted all items from the guidelines and classified them according to the main sections of reporting guidelines (title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion and other information). We performed a narrative synthesis based on descriptive statistics. Results: Of 7704 records screened (published between 1999 and 2019), we included 39 guidelines, from which data were extracted from 57 reports. Of the 39 guidelines, 17 were for designing scaling interventions and 22 for reporting implementation interventions. At least one female author was listed in 31 guidelines, and 21 first authors were female. None of the authors belonged to the patient stakeholder group. Only one guideline clearly identified a patient as having participated in the consensus process. More than half the guidelines (56%) had been developed using an evidence-based process. In total, 750 items were extracted from the 39 guidelines and distributed into the 7 main sections. Conclusion: Relevant items identified could inform the development of a reporting guideline for scaling studies of evidence-based health interventions. This and our assessment of guidelines could contribute to better reporting in the science and practice of scaling.
- Subject
- quality reporting; reporting guideline; scale and spread; scaling; systematic review
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1500226
- Identifier
- uon:54887
- Identifier
- ISSN:0025-7974
- Rights
- x
- Language
- eng
- Reviewed
- Hits: 409
- Visitors: 409
- Downloads: 0
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|